It was nearly the end of our Sunday evening service when I heard a crash from the kitchen. As soon as the benediction was spoken, I was called out of the sanctuary to pray with the woman who had been preparing the post-service tea. The crash had been the falling urn of boiling water, which had spilled its load over her front. She was clearly in pain and shock, waiting for her husband to get the car to take her to the hospital. As we waited with her a group of us knelt and prayed for healing.
The initial results of this prayer seemed almost miraculous, and we began to wonder if perhaps our prayers had ‘worked’. Then, in the days that followed, we realised that she had been severely injured in the accident, that a series of skin grafts would be necessary, and that our prayers had not brought on the miracle for which we had hoped. For some of the people in the group, this was a significant crisis of faith, and they questioned why God had not ‘heard our prayers’.
Over the years I have grown more than a little uncomfortable with some of the language we use for prayer. We talk about prayer ‘working’ as if it’s an appliance we just need to turn on for a particular task. When what we ask for happens, we say that God has ‘heard our prayers,’ as if God sometimes turns a deaf ear and ignores our requests, causing them not to be ‘answered’. We tend to think of prayer as a way to get God to do things ‘for us’, or to do things ‘to’ other people and situations. John Wesley is even quoted as saying that “God does nothing except in answer to believing prayer”. Yet, this view of prayer has created more than a few problems for us as Christ-followers, and has brought about the end of faith for more than a few believers.
For the record, I believe in prayer with all my heart. I have seen some dramatic changes in people’s lives that can only be connected to times spent in prayer together. But, the problem is that we don’t know when prayer will help and when it won’t. We can’t explain why God seems to “intervene” dramatically to save and heal some people, and doesn’t seem to act at all for others. And this is where, I believe, our language breaks down. We have become so focussed on “results” in prayer, that I believe we may have lost the essence of prayer in the process. This may be why some of us struggle with prayer so much. It is also why I believe that the practice of intercession is such a crucial part of our worship.
When we place intercessory prayer in the context of an encounter with God, then we begin to speak and think about prayer differently. In the context of worship we recognise that God is always at work in every situation and every life – so we do not need to ‘manipulate’ or convince God to act. In the context of worship we recognise that prayer is not about changing God, but about changing us – shifting us out of our own limited perspectives on the world and its struggles, and into a divine orientation. In the context of worship we worry less about whether prayer ‘works’ and more about how we can work to respond to the situations and people for which we have been moved to pray.
I wonder how different our lives of prayer would be if we approached intercession in this way? I wonder how different our worship might be if we opened ourselves to be changed by what we pray so that we might live it out each day. As my friend Taylor Burton-Edwards (of the General Board of Discipleship of the United Methodist Church) says: “The question is not, ‘Do we pray well?’ The question is, ‘Do we live well what we pray?’”